nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 117:
Line 117: − − == Completely agree == − − I am happy to finally see coherent logic on a wiki encyclopedia! I believe this 'google search' logic should be applied to other articles as well! For example, a quick google search of "porn" revealed about 220,000,000 webpages, which indicates that "porn" accounts for about 256,709% more worldly accomplishements than "minister's son"s do (which only returns a paltry 85,700 websites). This should be stated explicitly in both articles. I also firmly believe that we need an article for "gay anal porn", because it returns 229,000 responses, indicating 262% more worldly influence than "minister's son"s.--[[User:Castoridae|Castoridae]] 15:32, 9 March 2008 (EDT)
Conservapedia talk:Are atheists productive (view source)
Revision as of 04:56, March 10, 2008
, 04:56, March 10, 2008Reverted edits by Castoridae (Talk); changed back to last version by OldMan
:: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 21:39, 26 February 2008 (EST)
:: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 21:39, 26 February 2008 (EST)
:::Trouble is, without a properly conducted study (either done by someone here or already done and tracked down), the article remains a blog-like opinion piece with no basis in demonstrable fact. Maybe it should be moved to the "essay" space. [[User:Humblpi|Humblpi]] 06:44, 27 February 2008 (EST)
:::Trouble is, without a properly conducted study (either done by someone here or already done and tracked down), the article remains a blog-like opinion piece with no basis in demonstrable fact. Maybe it should be moved to the "essay" space. [[User:Humblpi|Humblpi]] 06:44, 27 February 2008 (EST)