31
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 81:
Line 81: + + + + +
Debate:Is the evidence in favor of evolution convincing? (view source)
Revision as of 18:24, March 16, 2008
, 18:24, March 16, 2008→Many Authoritative Sounding Assertions Does Not Make For A Conclusive Debate
: (paraphrasing Jbs224): Let's face it, there are many "authoritative" voices coming from the scientific community that makes creation convincing. On the flip side, there are many "charasmatic" voices coming from the evolution camp which counter those voices. The evidence ends up being interpreted according to one's world view. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:25, 30 January 2008 (EST)
: (paraphrasing Jbs224): Let's face it, there are many "authoritative" voices coming from the scientific community that makes creation convincing. On the flip side, there are many "charasmatic" voices coming from the evolution camp which counter those voices. The evidence ends up being interpreted according to one's world view. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:25, 30 January 2008 (EST)
It's funny about your so called authoritative voices in the scientific community that you mention are nearly all of them religious fundamentalists themselves...or at least funded by the Disc Institute, a religious think tank. If you want to "teach the controversy" then you can also teach holocaust denying, because there are plenty of "academics" who don't believe in the holocaust either.
Evolution, like the existence of the holocaust, is strongly supported by evidence. Those who believe otherwise hasn't published a single article and submitted it for peer revision in the realm of academics.
[[User:Intranetusa|Intranetusa]] 14:24, 16 March 2008 (EDT)