nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 80:
Line 80: − + Line 86:
Line 86: + + + +
Debate:Is the evidence in favor of evolution convincing? (view source)
Revision as of 00:54, March 17, 2008
, 00:54, March 17, 2008→Many Authoritative Sounding Assertions Does Not Make For A Conclusive Debate: Justify your claims
: Oh? How many creatures or plants have you seen evolve into quite different creatures or plants? Answer please. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 20:13, 19 February 2008 (EST)
: Oh? How many creatures or plants have you seen evolve into quite different creatures or plants? Answer please. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 20:13, 19 February 2008 (EST)
: (paraphrasing Jbs224): Let's face it, there are many "authoritative" voices coming from the scientific community that makes creation convincing. On the flip side, there are many "charasmatic" voices coming from the evolution camp which counter those voices. The evidence ends up being interpreted according to one's world view. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:25, 30 January 2008 (EST)
: (paraphrasing Jbw224): Let's face it, there are many "authoritative" voices coming from the scientific community that makes creation convincing. On the flip side, there are many "charasmatic" voices coming from the evolution camp which counter those voices. The evidence ends up being interpreted according to one's world view. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:25, 30 January 2008 (EST)
It's funny about your so called authoritative voices in the scientific community that you mention are nearly all of them religious fundamentalists themselves...or at least funded by the Disc Institute, a religious think tank. If you want to "teach the controversy" then you can also teach holocaust denying, because there are plenty of "academics" who don't believe in the holocaust either.
It's funny about your so called authoritative voices in the scientific community that you mention are nearly all of them religious fundamentalists themselves...or at least funded by the Disc Institute, a religious think tank. If you want to "teach the controversy" then you can also teach holocaust denying, because there are plenty of "academics" who don't believe in the holocaust either.
Evolution, like the existence of the holocaust, is strongly supported by evidence. Those who believe otherwise hasn't published a single article and submitted it for peer revision in the realm of academics.
Evolution, like the existence of the holocaust, is strongly supported by evidence. Those who believe otherwise hasn't published a single article and submitted it for peer revision in the realm of academics.
[[User:Intranetusa|Intranetusa]] 14:24, 16 March 2008 (EDT)
[[User:Intranetusa|Intranetusa]] 14:24, 16 March 2008 (EDT)
: Please justify your claim of the persons concerned being "fundamentalists". And of them being funded by the Discovery Institute.
: Also please justify your claim that there are "plenty" of academics who don't believe in the holocaust.
: Your assertions that evolution is strongly supported by the evidence is disputed by many people. Your claim that those that believe otherwise haven't published a single peer-reviewed article is absolutely false.
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 20:54, 16 March 2008 (EDT)