Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 9:
Line 9: + + +
→Confusion as a debating tactic
*These support the idea that a subjective cultural ''imprimatur'' of acceptability does not save the objective immorality of the act.
*These support the idea that a subjective cultural ''imprimatur'' of acceptability does not save the objective immorality of the act.
Three reasons to object to the deleted text.
#It doesn't matter what one's attitude is. Conservatives believe that moral law is absolute, even if there is some discussion over just precisely what it is that moral law requires or forbids.
#It doesn't matter what one's attitude is. Conservatives believe that moral law is absolute, even if there is some discussion over just precisely what it is that moral law requires or forbids.
#Theft and murder also have existed throughout history, but no one argues that this makes these acts acceptable.
#Theft and murder also have existed throughout history, but no one argues that this makes these acts acceptable.
#Don't use 100 dollar phrases like subjective cultural ''imprimatur'' - we speak plain English around here, bub.
#Don't use 100 dollar phrases like subjective cultural ''imprimatur'' - we speak plain English around here, bub.
Let's try to be clear. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:48, 19 March 2008 (EDT)