Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
501 bytes added ,  00:32, March 23, 2008
added another cite
Line 8: Line 8:  
# The [[Harvard abortion study]] disproved harm from [[abortion]].  IN FACT, the study showed a sharp increase in the deadly progesterone receptor-negative (PR-) breast cancer.<ref>[[Harvard abortion study]] (describing the sharp increase and also noting deceptive aspects of the reporting on the study)</ref>
 
# The [[Harvard abortion study]] disproved harm from [[abortion]].  IN FACT, the study showed a sharp increase in the deadly progesterone receptor-negative (PR-) breast cancer.<ref>[[Harvard abortion study]] (describing the sharp increase and also noting deceptive aspects of the reporting on the study)</ref>
 
# The Lancet abortion article disproved harm from [[abortion]].  IN FACT, the Lancet study showed that 33 out of 39 large studies of breast cancer patients had an increased risk of breast cancer from abortion beyond the effect of avoiding a pregnancy.<ref>http://www.jpands.org/vol10no1/aschlafly.pdf (p. 12)</ref>
 
# The Lancet abortion article disproved harm from [[abortion]].  IN FACT, the Lancet study showed that 33 out of 39 large studies of breast cancer patients had an increased risk of breast cancer from abortion beyond the effect of avoiding a pregnancy.<ref>http://www.jpands.org/vol10no1/aschlafly.pdf (p. 12)</ref>
−
# Denying that childbirth is healthy.  IN FACT, all scientists and studies agree that childbirth is highly preventive of cancer in women, and [[abortion]] destroys that benefit.
+
# Denying that childbirth is healthy.  IN FACT, all scientists and studies agree that childbirth is highly preventive of cancer in women, and [[abortion]] destroys that benefit.<ref>"Compared with women who gave birth before the age of 22, those who had their first child in their thirties were 63 per cent more likely to develop breast cancer before the menopause, and 35 per cent more likely to develop the disease afterwards."
 +
Why?  New Scientist reported that "Changes to breast cells in the third trimester of pregnancy are thought to protect the breasts from cancer." [http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn1917-delaying-childbirth-increases-breast-cancer-risk.html]</ref>
 
# Relying on biased newspaper accounts of abortion studies.  IN FACT, newspapers and abstracts often distort the actual scientific findings.
 
# Relying on biased newspaper accounts of abortion studies.  IN FACT, newspapers and abstracts often distort the actual scientific findings.
 
# Treating a small study that denies harm as equivalent to a large study that indicates harm.  IN FACT, studies showing harm are larger than those that deny it.
 
# Treating a small study that denies harm as equivalent to a large study that indicates harm.  IN FACT, studies showing harm are larger than those that deny it.
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,619

edits

Navigation menu