10
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 51:
Line 51: + +
no edit summary
::: You seem to miss the point. The [[economic]] cost of abortion is primarily the [[opportunity cost]] of a life. Have you ever taken a course in economics?--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:31, 22 March 2008 (EDT)
::: You seem to miss the point. The [[economic]] cost of abortion is primarily the [[opportunity cost]] of a life. Have you ever taken a course in economics?--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:31, 22 March 2008 (EDT)
:::: So is abstinence costing us $500,000 per missed sexual opportunity? --[[User:Jdellaro|Jdellaro]] 10:45, 23 March 2008 (EDT)
:::::Crocoite, deleting the above comment was [[censorship]] and in bad form. Jdellaro made a valid point: if Andy's arguing the opportunity cost of a life is to be taken into account, he's arguing ''for sex and childbirth,'' not ''against abortion.'' It's a similar tactic we've seen before: when he tries to "link" abortion and breast cancer, because childbirth reduces the risk of cancer, he's just arguing ''for childbirth'' and ''for its natural predecessor, sex.'' This "article" - at least Andy's additions - all help promote ''sex'', not impugn ''abortion''. Jdellaro pointed that out, and you ban him for it? You're just showing your own idiocy.-[[User:WilliamA|WilliamA]] 15:45, 23 March 2008 (EDT)
== I was asked to help find cites ==
== I was asked to help find cites ==