79
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 7:
Line 7: + +
Debate:Why do we still have an embargo on Cuba? (view source)
Revision as of 15:59, March 24, 2008
, 15:59, March 24, 2008no edit summary
If the embargo were lifted it would have the beneficial effect of bringing Cuba in to the mainstream. The U.S and Cuba are like two neighbours who won't talk too each other, the U.S could improve relations by making such a positive gesture. North Korea a is case in point, the World Community began to provide aid to the country, and thus North Korea became open enough to listen to the U.S and abandon its nuclear programme. [[User:Angband|Angband]] 11:57, 24 March 2008 (EDT)
If the embargo were lifted it would have the beneficial effect of bringing Cuba in to the mainstream. The U.S and Cuba are like two neighbours who won't talk too each other, the U.S could improve relations by making such a positive gesture. North Korea a is case in point, the World Community began to provide aid to the country, and thus North Korea became open enough to listen to the U.S and abandon its nuclear programme. [[User:Angband|Angband]] 11:57, 24 March 2008 (EDT)
:I believe anybody who still uses repression as a legitimate tactic of goverance should be shunned by the humanitarian international community. [[User:LeaningRight|LeaningRight]] 11:59, 24 March 2008 (EDT)