1,512 bytes added
, 13:20, March 30, 2008
Childbirth reduces a woman's risk of breast cancer, and when a pregnant woman chooses [[abortion]] instead she increases her risk. This increased risk has been proven by the vast majority of studies, many predating the politicization of abortion, and by animal studies.
Like the tobacco industry, which denied for decades that cigarettes cause lung cancer, the billion-dollar [[abortion]] industry uses several statistical tricks to deny the undeniable harm of [[abortion]]. These tricks include:
* include in the study many women who had an an abortion but are too young to develop breast cancer, which has an average age of diagnosis of 61, so that post-abortion women appear unharmed<ref>See, e.g., the Melbye study [http://www.jewsforlife.org/ABCs.cfm] and the [[Harvard Abortion Study]]</ref>
* exclude older, less politicized studies by saying that the researchers cannot be found to discuss it<ref>See, e.g., the Beral (Lancet) analysis.</ref>
* downplay, and omit from the conclusion, significant medical harms found in post-abortive women<ref>See, e.g., the [[Harvard abortion study]], the Melbye study, and the Beral (Lancet) analysis.</ref>
* be silent when newspapers exaggerate the misreport the findings of the paper<ref>See, e.g., the Beral (Lancet) analysis.</ref>
* in imitation of Hitler's attempt to discredit Einstein, invoke the power of government to deny a scientific finding<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/National_Cancer_Institute_on_Abortion</ref>
== References ==
<references/>