Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
more
Line 3: Line 3:  
Like the tobacco industry, which denied for decades that cigarettes cause lung cancer, the billion-dollar [[abortion]] industry uses several statistical tricks to deny the undeniable harm of [[abortion]].  These tricks include:
 
Like the tobacco industry, which denied for decades that cigarettes cause lung cancer, the billion-dollar [[abortion]] industry uses several statistical tricks to deny the undeniable harm of [[abortion]].  These tricks include:
   −
* include in the study many women who had an an abortion but are too young to develop breast cancer, which has an average age of diagnosis of 61, so that post-abortion women appear unharmed<ref>See, e.g., the Melbye study [http://www.jewsforlife.org/ABCs.cfm] and the [[Harvard Abortion Study]]</ref>
+
* include in the study many women who had an an [[abortion]] but are too young to develop breast cancer, which has an average age of diagnosis of 61, to deny harm to the post-abortion women<ref>See, e.g., the Melbye study [http://www.jewsforlife.org/ABCs.cfm] and the [[Harvard Abortion Study]]</ref>
 
* exclude older, less politicized studies by saying that the researchers cannot be found to discuss it<ref>See, e.g., the Beral (Lancet) analysis.</ref>
 
* exclude older, less politicized studies by saying that the researchers cannot be found to discuss it<ref>See, e.g., the Beral (Lancet) analysis.</ref>
 
* downplay, and omit from the conclusion, significant medical harms found in post-abortive women<ref>See, e.g., the [[Harvard abortion study]], the Melbye study, and the Beral (Lancet) analysis.</ref>
 
* downplay, and omit from the conclusion, significant medical harms found in post-abortive women<ref>See, e.g., the [[Harvard abortion study]], the Melbye study, and the Beral (Lancet) analysis.</ref>
 
* be silent when newspapers exaggerate the misreport the findings of the paper<ref>See, e.g., the Beral (Lancet) analysis.</ref>
 
* be silent when newspapers exaggerate the misreport the findings of the paper<ref>See, e.g., the Beral (Lancet) analysis.</ref>
−
* in imitation of Hitler's attempt to discredit Einstein, invoke the power of government to deny a scientific finding<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/National_Cancer_Institute_on_Abortion</ref>
+
* in imitation of [[Hitler]]'s attempt to discredit [[Einstein]],<ref>http://www.jpands.org/vol13no1/lanfranchi.pdf</ref> invoke the power of government to deny a scientific finding<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/National_Cancer_Institute_on_Abortion</ref>
−
 
+
* use a demographic that is not typical of post-abortion women, and conceal that from the reported results<ref>See, e.g., [[Harvard abortion study]]</ref>
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
    
<references/>
 
<references/>
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,219

edits

Navigation menu