36
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 17:
Line 17: + +
→Continued
I said "DNA and '''every other attribute''' of a human being." Regardless, I'm more interested in why promoters of [[abortion]] refuse to tell the mother that she is harming her own long-term health if she chooses [[abortion]]. If the unborn child is not a human and abortion is so good, then why the need for [[deceit]]?--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:59, 31 March 2008 (EDT)
I said "DNA and '''every other attribute''' of a human being." Regardless, I'm more interested in why promoters of [[abortion]] refuse to tell the mother that she is harming her own long-term health if she chooses [[abortion]]. If the unborn child is not a human and abortion is so good, then why the need for [[deceit]]?--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:59, 31 March 2008 (EDT)
:I think the argument about abortion and breast cancer is actually an argument for childbirth, as opposed to abstinence, miscarriage, and all other life choices that ''don't end in childbirth'', many of which aren't abortion related. Further, if you're going to quantify the reasons to oppose abortion based merely on an incidental benefit to the mother, I think your culture of life really becomes a culture of Me. It's just a talking point, and not a very good one. Sorry :-/-[[User:DParker|DParker]] 21:04, 31 March 2008 (EDT)