5,580
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 93:
Line 93: + + + + + +
Comment
: "''Surely there has to be a conservative who understands geology so that progress need not be hijacked by a tiny but aggressive minority?''": In other words, because I'm supposedly in a minority, I don't understand geology? Are you really saying that because I don't ''agree with'' something, therefore I don't ''understand'' it?
: "''Surely there has to be a conservative who understands geology so that progress need not be hijacked by a tiny but aggressive minority?''": In other words, because I'm supposedly in a minority, I don't understand geology? Are you really saying that because I don't ''agree with'' something, therefore I don't ''understand'' it?
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:23, 1 April 2008 (EDT)
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:23, 1 April 2008 (EDT)
== Comment ==
I was asked to comment about this "laughing-stock" article, but frankly I don't see it. Granted, I only gave it a brows and it's entirely possible that I missed these gems, but everything seems ok to me. Certainly, Everwill believes that YEC is untrue, and I am inclined to believe (if only by default and not by education), however, there's nothing wrong with the YEC viewpoint -- in fact, it's encouraged at this encyclopedia. Additionally, it's a pet peeve of mine when in articles it is said "Y is X" instead of "Z believe that Y is X" (I don't know why I did that in reverse alphabetical order, but I digress) however in this article, all of the YEC statements that I saw were properly attributed.
Perhaps, Everwill, you could bring up some more specific claims? (If they are in the section above I apologize; that looked more like a discussion of the correctness of YEC Geology, not a discussion of this article in and of itself). [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 10:29, 1 April 2008 (EDT)