Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 99:
Line 99: + +
a bit of balance?
Perhaps, Everwill, you could bring up some more specific claims? (If they are in the section above I apologize; that looked more like a discussion of the correctness of YEC Geology, not a discussion of this article in and of itself). [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 10:29, 1 April 2008 (EDT)
Perhaps, Everwill, you could bring up some more specific claims? (If they are in the section above I apologize; that looked more like a discussion of the correctness of YEC Geology, not a discussion of this article in and of itself). [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 10:29, 1 April 2008 (EDT)
:Perhaps a nice, calm scholarly article comparing [[young earth]] and [[old earth]] scientific (and/or religious?) views would be helpful at some point. There are excellent reasons for Bible-believing Christians to adhere to the view that the [[age of the earth]] is in the thousands of years, as well as excellent scientific reasons for religious people to accept the modern mainstream view of billions of years. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 10:40, 1 April 2008 (EDT)