Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 110: Line 110:  
:On that note, enjoy this comment:
 
:On that note, enjoy this comment:
 
:* Meanwhile, several state legislatures have ruled that compensation for the negligent death of a pet — due to an auto accident, say, or to a veterinarian's error — need not be limited to the purchase price of the pet, but can be a considerably higher sum. This is based on the understandable belief that a pet is not mere property, but an actual family member. With that in mind a number of state and federal lawmakers have begun to introduce new legislation regarding fetal rights. Their apparent, controversial goal is to create a legal environment in which an unborn human baby enjoys the same legal rights as does a dog. [http://www.nationalreview.com/rice/rice200306160000.asp]
 
:* Meanwhile, several state legislatures have ruled that compensation for the negligent death of a pet — due to an auto accident, say, or to a veterinarian's error — need not be limited to the purchase price of the pet, but can be a considerably higher sum. This is based on the understandable belief that a pet is not mere property, but an actual family member. With that in mind a number of state and federal lawmakers have begun to introduce new legislation regarding fetal rights. Their apparent, controversial goal is to create a legal environment in which an unborn human baby enjoys the same legal rights as does a dog. [http://www.nationalreview.com/rice/rice200306160000.asp]
 +
 +
Gee Ed, thanks for the meaningful response. [[User:Murray|Murray]] 21:16, 2 April 2008 (EDT)
953

edits

Navigation menu