Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Essay:Adulteress Story (view source)

Revision as of 02:13, April 8, 2008

285 bytes added ,  02:13, April 8, 2008
reply
Line 38: Line 38:  
::::: The ''only'' valid reason is convincing evidence that it was added later.  All other reasons are invalid, meaningless, or heretical.
 
::::: The ''only'' valid reason is convincing evidence that it was added later.  All other reasons are invalid, meaningless, or heretical.
 
::::: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:48, 7 April 2008 (EDT)
 
::::: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:48, 7 April 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::::: Scholars agree and the documentary evidence proves that the adultress story was added later.  Motivation (politics) is relevant to understanding why logic and proof are rejected, and why the passage remains in the Bible.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:13, 7 April 2008 (EDT)
    
== What Constitutes Gospel? ==
 
== What Constitutes Gospel? ==
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,256

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/425994"

Navigation menu