511
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 53:
Line 53: +
Talk:Essay:Adulteress Story (view source)
Revision as of 15:02, April 7, 2008
, 15:02, April 7, 2008→What Constitutes Gospel?
::: It is not "indisputably" added later. Some ''do'' dispute it. The NIV's note (I'd be surprised if yours doesn't say why, Ajkgordon), does not say that it was added later. It says, "The most reliable early manuscripts and other ancient witnesses do not have Mark 16:9-20.". The ''implication'' is that it was added later, but being added later is not what the NIV ''says''. And the implication could be wrong. I'm not saying that it ''is'' wrong; just that it could be. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:52, 7 April 2008 (EDT)
::: It is not "indisputably" added later. Some ''do'' dispute it. The NIV's note (I'd be surprised if yours doesn't say why, Ajkgordon), does not say that it was added later. It says, "The most reliable early manuscripts and other ancient witnesses do not have Mark 16:9-20.". The ''implication'' is that it was added later, but being added later is not what the NIV ''says''. And the implication could be wrong. I'm not saying that it ''is'' wrong; just that it could be. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:52, 7 April 2008 (EDT)
::::It might, Philip, but I can't see it. [[User:Ajkgordon|Ajkgordon]] 10:54, 7 April 2008 (EDT)
::::It might, Philip, but I can't see it. [[User:Ajkgordon|Ajkgordon]] 10:54, 7 April 2008 (EDT)
::::Begging your pardon. It's the King James and it makes no mention at all, not even brackets. I must have been thinking of another version. My apologies. [[User:Ajkgordon|Ajkgordon]] 11:02, 7 April 2008 (EDT)