21
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 300:
Line 300: + + + +
no edit summary
I put it up for deletion at the request of User:WhatWouldJesusEdit. Though I don't really think that it should be deleted, his camplaint was valid. Therefore, I thought it reasonable to put the article up for deletion so as to get some disscusion on the matter. --[[User:BenjaminS|BenjaminS]] 00:37, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
I put it up for deletion at the request of User:WhatWouldJesusEdit. Though I don't really think that it should be deleted, his camplaint was valid. Therefore, I thought it reasonable to put the article up for deletion so as to get some disscusion on the matter. --[[User:BenjaminS|BenjaminS]] 00:37, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
==Hillary Clinton==
You undid one of my edits, saying "whatreallyhappened is not an acceptable source". But it wasn't cited for anything except to note that "there were allegations of a coverup." And there certainly were! And the link provided many, many pieces of evidence to explain why those allegations were so widespread. I'd understand the edit if I'd claimed that the link proved that there was a murder and a coverup, but that wasn't the claim. In fact noting that there were allegations of a coverup is so un-controversial that I could find an MSM citation noting those allegations. Would that be preferable over citing a site with a conservative bias? [[User:Bwilliston|Bwilliston]] 21:48, 16 March 2007 (EDT)