768
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 304:
Line 304: + + + +
US Senate
You undid one of my edits, saying "whatreallyhappened is not an acceptable source". But it wasn't cited for anything except to note that "there were allegations of a coverup." And there certainly were! And the link provided many, many pieces of evidence to explain why those allegations were so widespread. I'd understand the edit if I'd claimed that the link proved that there was a murder and a coverup, but that wasn't the claim. In fact noting that there were allegations of a coverup is so un-controversial that I could find an MSM citation noting those allegations. Would that be preferable over citing a site with a conservative bias? [[User:Bwilliston|Bwilliston]] 21:48, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
You undid one of my edits, saying "whatreallyhappened is not an acceptable source". But it wasn't cited for anything except to note that "there were allegations of a coverup." And there certainly were! And the link provided many, many pieces of evidence to explain why those allegations were so widespread. I'd understand the edit if I'd claimed that the link proved that there was a murder and a coverup, but that wasn't the claim. In fact noting that there were allegations of a coverup is so un-controversial that I could find an MSM citation noting those allegations. Would that be preferable over citing a site with a conservative bias? [[User:Bwilliston|Bwilliston]] 21:48, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
== US Senate ==
I had to undo a couple of your edits on the US Senate page. Just as an FYI, Lincoln Chafee is no longer in the US Senate. And the Democrats aren't considered to have the majority because Bernie Sanders and Joe Lieberman are more liberal than average, they have it because those two Senators caucus with the Dmeocrats. The Democrats offically have the majority of the Senate. [[User:Myk|Myk]] 22:18, 16 March 2007 (EDT)