Changes

::I second Steve's comments.  I think that Conservapedia should embark on a project to purge the Bible of the insertions that liberals have added over the centuries. Conservapedia could create a truly conservative online edition of the Bible--[[User:Mathewson|Mathewson]] 14:01, 9 April 2008 (EDT).

::I second Steve's comments.  I think that Conservapedia should embark on a project to purge the Bible of the insertions that liberals have added over the centuries. Conservapedia could create a truly conservative online edition of the Bible--[[User:Mathewson|Mathewson]] 14:01, 9 April 2008 (EDT).

:::Dude, there already is a truly conservative edition of the Bible: The King James! See my recent additions to [[Liberal Christianity]]. Although truly conservative Christians are rare, even rarer than anyone else on the net, this site is the one of the closest I've found. That's why it bugged my when Aschlafly said the NIV was a conservative Bible. N means "new!" NIV, and all the other "new" versions, are based on a completely different Greek translation of the Bible than KJV. That's why they doctrine the get from it is so different. --[[User:StevenM|Steve]] 14:13, 9 April 2008 (EDT)

:::Dude, there already is a truly conservative edition of the Bible: The King James! See my recent additions to [[Liberal Christianity]]. Although truly conservative Christians are rare, even rarer than anyone else on the net, this site is the one of the closest I've found. That's why it bugged me when Aschlafly said the NIV was a conservative Bible. N means "new!" NIV, and all the other "new" versions, are based on a completely different Greek translation of the Bible than KJV. That's why the doctrine they get from it is so different. --[[User:StevenM|Steve]] 14:13, 9 April 2008 (EDT)