Block, Upload, Automoderated users, edit
1,130
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 184:
Line 184: +
Talk:Essay:Adulteress Story (view source)
Revision as of 14:36, April 10, 2008
, 14:36, April 10, 2008no edit summary
::::::::::: It's not just that the adulteress passage was added later that makes it a hoax. It's also that the passage fundamentally contradicts both Christian principles (including the nature of forgiveness of sin and its complete effectiveness for those who seek it) and common sense (including the fact that [[Jesus]] would never have enjoyed unanimous support). The passage today is [[liberals]]'s favorite part of the [[Gospels]], and the passage is a hoax.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 09:39, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
::::::::::: It's not just that the adulteress passage was added later that makes it a hoax. It's also that the passage fundamentally contradicts both Christian principles (including the nature of forgiveness of sin and its complete effectiveness for those who seek it) and common sense (including the fact that [[Jesus]] would never have enjoyed unanimous support). The passage today is [[liberals]]'s favorite part of the [[Gospels]], and the passage is a hoax.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 09:39, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
:::::::::::::There is absolutely a slippery slope and you have shocked and disappointed me by taking the most liberal position I've ever known you to have. I'm taking time away from my essay to warn you of what my Pastor told me. Once you make yourself judge of what in the Bible can be authentic and what can not be authentic, nothing is off limits. No one can no for sure that there is not some earlier manuscript ''with'' the account of the adulteress in it. When you let you begin to make yourself guardian of the scriptures, protecting it and "making reversions as in a wiki," you are taking authority from God. Don't you trust Him to keep His own Word infallible? --[[User:StevenM|Steve]] 10:36, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
== Mosaic law ==
== Mosaic law ==