7
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6:
Line 6: +
Debate:Which was worse, the Civil War or effects or slavery? (view source)
Revision as of 04:32, April 12, 2008
, 04:32, April 12, 2008no edit summary
:Maybe, but slavery in itself wasn't a means of restricting rights? Any rights that might have been restricted under a different interpretations of the bill of rights don't even begin to compare with the restriction of rights that result from slavery. I can't think of anything worse than having your life completely owned and being subject to brutality and losing all free will. Even losing your right to bear arms or freedom of speech would be much, much better than being a slave? [[User:DanH|DanH]] 23:42, 11 April 2008 (EDT)
:Maybe, but slavery in itself wasn't a means of restricting rights? Any rights that might have been restricted under a different interpretations of the bill of rights don't even begin to compare with the restriction of rights that result from slavery. I can't think of anything worse than having your life completely owned and being subject to brutality and losing all free will. Even losing your right to bear arms or freedom of speech would be much, much better than being a slave? [[User:DanH|DanH]] 23:42, 11 April 2008 (EDT)
::Wow. Dan is absolutely right. And I left you a comment [http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:StevenM#Your_Fourteenth_Amendment_Issues here].-[[User:Murgatroyd|Murgatroyd]] 00:32, 12 April 2008 (EDT)