Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:  
:Maybe, but slavery in itself wasn't a means of restricting rights? Any rights that might have been restricted under a different interpretations of the bill of rights don't even begin to compare with the restriction of rights that result from slavery. I can't think of anything worse than having your life completely owned and being subject to brutality and losing all free will. Even losing your right to bear arms or freedom of speech would be much, much better than being a slave? [[User:DanH|DanH]] 23:42, 11 April 2008 (EDT)
 
:Maybe, but slavery in itself wasn't a means of restricting rights? Any rights that might have been restricted under a different interpretations of the bill of rights don't even begin to compare with the restriction of rights that result from slavery. I can't think of anything worse than having your life completely owned and being subject to brutality and losing all free will. Even losing your right to bear arms or freedom of speech would be much, much better than being a slave? [[User:DanH|DanH]] 23:42, 11 April 2008 (EDT)
 
::Wow.  Dan is absolutely right.  And I left you a comment [http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:StevenM#Your_Fourteenth_Amendment_Issues here].-[[User:Murgatroyd|Murgatroyd]] 00:32, 12 April 2008 (EDT)
 
::Wow.  Dan is absolutely right.  And I left you a comment [http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:StevenM#Your_Fourteenth_Amendment_Issues here].-[[User:Murgatroyd|Murgatroyd]] 00:32, 12 April 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
Honestly, I can see both sides of this issue, but I wanted to argue for the one on which less people would side. I think [[Abraham Lincoln]] would have been more likely to say that slavery was worse. In a speech to a delegation of ''free blacks at the White House'', August 14, 1862, Lincoln said: <blockquote>
 +
Your race suffers very greatly, many of them by living among us while ours suffers from your presence. In a word, we suffer on each sid. If this be admitted, it affords a reason at least, why we should be separated.
 +
</blockquote>
 +
 +
Unfortunately, I will quickly tire of playing the "[[Devil's Advocate]]," and join the side that I believe. I argued the way I did, not because I'm racist; I thought I'd learn more and you guys gave me some great information. This "debate" will probably run out of gas after I stop disagreeing with you, but it was educational while it lasted. Thanks. --[[User:StevenM|Steve]] 07:25, 14 April 2008 (EDT)
Block, Upload, Automoderated users, edit
1,130

edits

Navigation menu