Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,797
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 9:
Line 9: − − :[[Our Dear Leader|Bush]] supports it, therefore it is legal. --[[User:HelpJizzlulz|HelpJizzlulz]] 21:56, 12 April 2008 (EDT)
Debate:Is waterboarding torture? (view source)
Revision as of 01:59, April 13, 2008
, 01:59, April 13, 2008Reverted edits by HelpJizzlulz (Talk); changed back to last version by Helldog85
:Wait a minute - 'we need to torture muslims if they bomb us' - you mean you wouldn't torture others who bomb you? Are you suggesting that Followers of Islam are in some way more deserving of torture? Other than that, if you advocate the torture of prisoners (be they Prisoners of War in the technical sense or not) then surely you abandon any right to be appalled if other nations/organisations adopt the same tactics with captured Americans..? [[User:SpinnakerMagic|SpinnakerMagic]] 15:34, 14 May 2007 (BST)
:Wait a minute - 'we need to torture muslims if they bomb us' - you mean you wouldn't torture others who bomb you? Are you suggesting that Followers of Islam are in some way more deserving of torture? Other than that, if you advocate the torture of prisoners (be they Prisoners of War in the technical sense or not) then surely you abandon any right to be appalled if other nations/organisations adopt the same tactics with captured Americans..? [[User:SpinnakerMagic|SpinnakerMagic]] 15:34, 14 May 2007 (BST)