Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: + +
sources
Isn't that source a little iffy? If we cannot accept about.com, then why should we accept answers.yahoo.com which is highly based on user contribution (like Wikipedia)? o_0 [[User:Kektklik|Fuzzy|AFD]] 15:19, 18 April 2008 (EDT)
Isn't that source a little iffy? If we cannot accept about.com, then why should we accept answers.yahoo.com which is highly based on user contribution (like Wikipedia)? o_0 [[User:Kektklik|Fuzzy|AFD]] 15:19, 18 April 2008 (EDT)
:I'm inclined to agree with you there Fuzzy. [[User:BrianCo|BrianCo]] 15:34, 18 April 2008 (EDT)
:I'm inclined to agree with you there Fuzzy. [[User:BrianCo|BrianCo]] 15:34, 18 April 2008 (EDT)
::I thought it was better than no reference at all. Your choices at this point are to delete the information, or to find a better source. Take your pick. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 15:37, 18 April 2008 (EDT)