Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 238: Line 238:     
: Your phrase "unconvincingly hysterical" is so absurd that I'm skeptical you even saw the movie.  If you did, I doubt you saw it with an open mind if that is your analysis.  Your phrase is too ridiculous to be genuine, in my opinion.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:40, 20 April 2008 (EDT)
 
: Your phrase "unconvincingly hysterical" is so absurd that I'm skeptical you even saw the movie.  If you did, I doubt you saw it with an open mind if that is your analysis.  Your phrase is too ridiculous to be genuine, in my opinion.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:40, 20 April 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
:: I am utterly dumbfounded. I offer a brief review -- admittedly negative -- and, for my troubles, I receive a stream of abuse concerning some supposed grammatical infelicity and I am then called a liar. How, exactly, did your puzzling objections to that phrase lead you to suppose I hadn't seen the film? (Not a rhetorical question.) I saw the film in New York City, which I am visiting for a press junket, and will happily answer any questions on it to prove my honesty. You really are a very, very rude man. I am happy to say that, to this point, most American conservatives I've encountered have been very civil. You are, happily, not representative in that respect. [[User:KeithJoseph|KeithJoseph]] 19:45, 20 April 2008 (GMT)
    
==ID and science==
 
==ID and science==
113

edits

Navigation menu