28
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 9:
Line 9: +
Debate:Does Conservapedia censor opponents the way Expelled says ID advocates are censored? (view source)
Revision as of 20:44, April 22, 2008
, 20:44, April 22, 2008→EXPELLED from CONSERVAPEDIA
:::An encyclopedia. That's funny. I think what this debate should really be about is what comes first. Conservative or encyclopedia. Because right now this is one massive conservative/YEC blog. Make a choice opinions or facts. [[User:Rellik|Rellik]] 20:25, 21 April 2008 (EDT)
:::An encyclopedia. That's funny. I think what this debate should really be about is what comes first. Conservative or encyclopedia. Because right now this is one massive conservative/YEC blog. Make a choice opinions or facts. [[User:Rellik|Rellik]] 20:25, 21 April 2008 (EDT)
LT, I'm throwing mud for your benefit. This is a problem you should confront, because it makes your "encyclopedia" (1) hypocritical and (2) EMPTY. Look at the active users. They're all sysops, trolls, or sockpuppets. There's no exchange of ideas. There's no discussion. There's only one party line and that's it. It's stiflingly boring. It is a blog.-[[User:Chimera1|Chimera1]] 16:42, 22 April 2008 (EDT)
LT, I'm throwing mud for your benefit. This is a problem you should confront, because it makes your "encyclopedia" (1) hypocritical and (2) EMPTY. Look at the active users. They're all sysops, trolls, or sockpuppets. There's no exchange of ideas. There's no discussion. There's only one party line and that's it. It's stiflingly boring. It is a blog.-[[User:Chimera1|Chimera1]] 16:42, 22 April 2008 (EDT)
:The point, though, is not that your encyclopedia is failing. It's that you're guilty of the same crime you accuse "BIG SCIENCE" of (without cause, I might add). And you've yet to rebut that claim.-[[User:Chimera1|Chimera1]] 16:44, 22 April 2008 (EDT)