Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 8:
Line 8: + + +
Debate:Does Conservapedia censor opponents the way Expelled says ID advocates are censored? (view source)
Revision as of 21:18, April 22, 2008
, 21:18, April 22, 2008more than YEC
:::You are the "users" (user) who tried to "discuss" it. Which was basically the liberal see how much mud you can throw and force people to try to clean it up. Rather than ask questions, you made truth by proclamation, and went outside of the article bounds or even what was being discussed. And it's not wise to set up the equivalent of "You wouldn't dare block me!" -- Yes we will. Now try and find something constructive to do in life. Here, we'd like to work on an Encylopedia. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 17:43, 21 April 2008 (EDT)
:::You are the "users" (user) who tried to "discuss" it. Which was basically the liberal see how much mud you can throw and force people to try to clean it up. Rather than ask questions, you made truth by proclamation, and went outside of the article bounds or even what was being discussed. And it's not wise to set up the equivalent of "You wouldn't dare block me!" -- Yes we will. Now try and find something constructive to do in life. Here, we'd like to work on an Encylopedia. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 17:43, 21 April 2008 (EDT)
:::An encyclopedia. That's funny. I think what this debate should really be about is what comes first. Conservative or encyclopedia. Because right now this is one massive conservative/YEC blog. Make a choice opinions or facts. [[User:Rellik|Rellik]] 20:25, 21 April 2008 (EDT)
:::An encyclopedia. That's funny. I think what this debate should really be about is what comes first. Conservative or encyclopedia. Because right now this is one massive conservative/YEC blog. Make a choice opinions or facts. [[User:Rellik|Rellik]] 20:25, 21 April 2008 (EDT)
::::In this "blog" are several articles on topics related to the [[orgins debate]].. We try to cover all 4 major perspectives: naturalistic evolution, intelligent design, old earth & young earth creationism. If you're having trouble locating articles which take a perspective other than YEC, I can help you find them. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 17:18, 22 April 2008 (EDT)
LT, I'm throwing mud for your benefit. This is a problem you should confront, because it makes your "encyclopedia" (1) hypocritical and (2) EMPTY. Look at the active users. They're all sysops, trolls, or sockpuppets. There's no exchange of ideas. There's no discussion. There's only one party line and that's it. It's stiflingly boring. It is a blog.-[[User:Chimera1|Chimera1]] 16:42, 22 April 2008 (EDT)
LT, I'm throwing mud for your benefit. This is a problem you should confront, because it makes your "encyclopedia" (1) hypocritical and (2) EMPTY. Look at the active users. They're all sysops, trolls, or sockpuppets. There's no exchange of ideas. There's no discussion. There's only one party line and that's it. It's stiflingly boring. It is a blog.-[[User:Chimera1|Chimera1]] 16:42, 22 April 2008 (EDT)
:The point, though, is not that your encyclopedia is failing. It's that you're guilty of the same crime you accuse "BIG SCIENCE" of (without cause, I might add). And you've yet to rebut that claim.-[[User:Chimera1|Chimera1]] 16:44, 22 April 2008 (EDT)
:The point, though, is not that your encyclopedia is failing. It's that you're guilty of the same crime you accuse "BIG SCIENCE" of (without cause, I might add). And you've yet to rebut that claim.-[[User:Chimera1|Chimera1]] 16:44, 22 April 2008 (EDT)