1
edit
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 42:
Line 42: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + − − ==External Links== − *[http://www.theconservativevoice.com/article/31876.html True Face of an Abortion], [[Kevin Roeten]], ''[[The Conservative Voice]]'', April 25, 2008. Father Frank Pavone (Priests for Life) has posted two videos to YouTube that explains exactly what happens during an abortion. −
Undo revision 439586 by Special:Contributions/Crocoite (User talk:Crocoite) Reverting yet more vandalism...
Parsley (Petroselium sativum) can be used to induce abortion.<ref>[http://www.orgonelab.org/contracep.htm Herbal Fertility Control: Contraception and Abortion]</ref><ref>[http://www.sisterzeus.com/Parsley.htm Parsley]</ref>
Parsley (Petroselium sativum) can be used to induce abortion.<ref>[http://www.orgonelab.org/contracep.htm Herbal Fertility Control: Contraception and Abortion]</ref><ref>[http://www.sisterzeus.com/Parsley.htm Parsley]</ref>
==What is going on at CP?==
*A user asks for a [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk%3AAl_Franken&diff=438598&oldid=435562 response] and you [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Al_Franken&diff=next&oldid=438598 link] to a week old response. Why don't you just tell him to go Copulate himself?
*Psst, Ed, your [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Black_Entertainment_Television.&diff=439417&oldid=439416 racism is showing]
*Ed Poor shares a brawny vision of the world [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Unmarked&diff=prev&oldid=439397 with Tom of Finland].
*So <s>editors</s> contributors [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk%3AEoinc&diff=439391&oldid=433091 can't revert] without discussion (but sysops can on a whim), and [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk%3ACensorship&diff=439396&oldid=439383 unmarked ideas] are OK if conservative... but not if they're liberal! Wow, thanks for clarifying that, Eddie! This was over [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Censorship&diff=next&oldid=439327 one single revert] that Ed calls "edit warring", in which his edit removed imaginary liberal bias and put forth placement bias instead (it must be conservative bias to him though).'''Update:''' Lalalalala, [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Eoinc&curid=63635&diff=439433&oldid=439391 I can't hear you], by the way, did you need that [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:Eoinc irony meter]?
*Ed [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Censorship&diff=439327&oldid=439325 proves] once again that liberal bias is everywhere, sometimes it's just invisible to those without the omnipotence of sysops.
*Criticism? [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Expelled:_No_Intelligence_Allowed&curid=55627&diff=438907&oldid=438905 What criticism?] '''Update:''' That was just the warm-up, [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Expelled%3A_No_Intelligence_Allowed&diff=438919&oldid=438907 it seems!]
*One has to hope that [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk%3AExpelled%3A_No_Intelligence_Allowed&diff=438678&oldid=438604 the irony] is not lost on the poster.
*[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Kektklik&curid=56384&diff=438674&oldid=438370 O RLY?] The proverbial nail in the coffin.
*That's right Ed, your [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Board_of_Regents_v._Roth&diff=next&oldid=263880 wikilinks] are [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Board_of_Regents_v._Roth&diff=next&oldid=364461 silly]
*Parodist alarms are sounding for me, as Deborah [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk%3AHomosexuality_and_choice&diff=438510&oldid=438508 tells] us about her former fascination with <spamremoved>! '''Update:''' definitely a parodist. [http://www.conservapedia.com/Template:Antihitler Animal rights?]
*Ed Poor asks [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk%3ABarack_Obama&diff=438095&oldid=437854 a VERY uncomfortable question]... '''Update:''' [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Obama&oldid=438348#Affirmative_action Lively discussion!] Who invented the term first and will thus get credit for insulting Obama the most? '''Update 2:''' It's apparently settled, and Andy openly acknowledges that [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Affirmative_Action_President&diff=438424&oldid=438390 he simply made up] the term.
*Basket-weaving, terrorism, [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Homosexuality_is_a_choice&oldid=437751 hot man-on-man action]. it's all the same to Ed Poor.
*Roger [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Examples_of_Bias_in_Wikipedia&curid=2896&diff=437422&oldid=435942 resurfaces to complain] about him being blocked for conflict of interest on [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Phyllis_Schlafly&diff=prev&oldid=206166397 wikipedia and his refusal to follow rules].
*Philip, we ask [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&curid=51028&diff=437312&oldid=437035 the same thing] about your blog every day.
*When uploading an image of Fidel Castro, what is more important than saying where you got it from and what license it falls under? [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=&user=&page=Image%3AFidel+castro.JPG Pointing out Google Cuba rankings for the Atheism article, of course!] Andy then deletes it on the basis of "trimming" later.
*[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=delete&user=&page=Image%3ARepublican+candidates.jpg Schlafly Speak]: "based on" = "shamelessly stolen from", and "not yet consented" = "got caught".
*[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia_talk:Manual_of_Style&curid=41958&diff=436722&oldid=436721 ''We've worked hard to improve our reputation''] says Learn Together. You have? While we weren't watching, obviously!
*Yet another Conservative Value: If you see wrongdoing, [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Aschlafly&curid=59900&diff=436499&oldid=436489 mind your own damn business]!
*Wait wait... Andy is telling someone that a made up expression (which isn't really made up) is [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk%3AExpelled%3A_No_Intelligence_Allowed&diff=435374&oldid=435373 incoherent]
'''All this and more at the Wiki that is Rational'''
==References==
==References==
<references/>
<references/>
[[Category:Abortion]]
[[Category:Abortion]]