Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 84: Line 84:     
Once again the [[Liberal]]s ignore their own [[Liberal gullibility]] in this talk page. Making full use of their arsenal of [[Liberal tricks]] and [[Liberal tools]], the [[Liberal]]s wish to engage us, to prevent us from spending precious time in building this fine American [[Encyclopedia]]. While the [[Liberal]] engages in [[Liberal style|obstructionist tactics]], we take it all in and attempt to reason with the [[Liberal]]. Our counter argument is based on the premise that a [[Liberal]] has rational, justifiable beliefs, but this [[Liberal logic]] will not be entertained on this encyclopedia, and if you don't like you can get out. BS [[User:BS|BS]] 16:38, 26 April 2008 (EDT)
 
Once again the [[Liberal]]s ignore their own [[Liberal gullibility]] in this talk page. Making full use of their arsenal of [[Liberal tricks]] and [[Liberal tools]], the [[Liberal]]s wish to engage us, to prevent us from spending precious time in building this fine American [[Encyclopedia]]. While the [[Liberal]] engages in [[Liberal style|obstructionist tactics]], we take it all in and attempt to reason with the [[Liberal]]. Our counter argument is based on the premise that a [[Liberal]] has rational, justifiable beliefs, but this [[Liberal logic]] will not be entertained on this encyclopedia, and if you don't like you can get out. BS [[User:BS|BS]] 16:38, 26 April 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
That is the most paranoid, nasty and downright scariest thing I have ever read. Perhaps more meds? Look, BS, I am no liberal but the list as it stands is mostly made up of peoples beliefs, not peoples gullibilty. It is the fundamental flaw of the whole article. Some people actually dont believe in God nor atheists. Liberal Logic? These terms make no sense
 +
[[User:AdenJ|AdenJ]] 19:01, 26 April 2008 (EDT)
548

edits

Navigation menu