Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,482 bytes added ,  09:22, April 27, 2008
Line 61: Line 61:     
(To any born-again Christians, you may understand my question)
 
(To any born-again Christians, you may understand my question)
 +
 +
{{unsigned|MaveYEL}}
 +
: I understand the question.  Whether or not someone is a Christian depends on their own relationship with God, not on what church they belong to.  Also, probably no Christian has a perfect set of beliefs: probably every Christian believes ''something'' that is contrary to biblical teaching.  So "believing many unbiblical things" does not, of itself, mean that someone is not a Christian.
 +
: I would classify the Roman Catholic Church as "Christian", because it holds that Jesus is God, but I would also think that ''many'' people who are members of the church are not Christians, partly because many are members of the church out of tradition rather than conversion, and partly because there is insufficient emphasis on faith-based conversion.  But that doesn't mean that there are not (many?) Christians in the Roman Catholic church.
 +
: I feel that some "fundamentalist" Christians are too harsh on Catholics, although that is not to dismiss their valid objections to many Catholic teachings, such as the ones you mention.  And I would ask, is the Catholic church any worse than many liberal churches that reject the historicity of the creation account, accept homosexuality, reject miracles, etc. etc.?  I do feel that there is a fair bit of inconsistency there.
 +
: Does Conservapedia handle this issue the best way it can?  Probably not, but then Conservapedia's not perfect either!
 +
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 05:22, 27 April 2008 (EDT)
nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254

edits

Navigation menu