Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,897 bytes added ,  13:34, April 30, 2008
Line 62: Line 62:  
(To any born-again Christians, you may understand my question)
 
(To any born-again Christians, you may understand my question)
   −
{{unsigned|MaveYEL}}
+
{{User:MaveYEL|MaveYEL}}
 
: I understand the question.  Whether or not someone is a Christian depends on their own relationship with God, not on what church they belong to.  Also, probably no Christian has a perfect set of beliefs: probably every Christian believes ''something'' that is contrary to biblical teaching.  So "believing many unbiblical things" does not, of itself, mean that someone is not a Christian.
 
: I understand the question.  Whether or not someone is a Christian depends on their own relationship with God, not on what church they belong to.  Also, probably no Christian has a perfect set of beliefs: probably every Christian believes ''something'' that is contrary to biblical teaching.  So "believing many unbiblical things" does not, of itself, mean that someone is not a Christian.
 
: I would classify the Roman Catholic Church as "Christian", because it holds that Jesus is God, but I would also think that ''many'' people who are members of the church are not Christians, partly because many are members of the church out of tradition rather than conversion, and partly because there is insufficient emphasis on faith-based conversion.  But that doesn't mean that there are not (many?) Christians in the Roman Catholic church.
 
: I would classify the Roman Catholic Church as "Christian", because it holds that Jesus is God, but I would also think that ''many'' people who are members of the church are not Christians, partly because many are members of the church out of tradition rather than conversion, and partly because there is insufficient emphasis on faith-based conversion.  But that doesn't mean that there are not (many?) Christians in the Roman Catholic church.
Line 68: Line 68:  
: Does Conservapedia handle this issue the best way it can?  Probably not, but then Conservapedia's not perfect either!
 
: Does Conservapedia handle this issue the best way it can?  Probably not, but then Conservapedia's not perfect either!
 
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 05:22, 27 April 2008 (EDT)
 
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 05:22, 27 April 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
 +
(This is a discussion that may take a long time and much effort. I try not to talk too much on it, although I would like to clarify all doubts in this issue)
 +
 +
Hmm, here is my answer.
 +
 +
First: I do believe that some Catholics may be indeed Christians, that is receiving Jesus as their own personal Savior, as many Protestant fundamentalists say. However, if a Catholic is a Christian, his "Catholic" status is just a label. I see many people in Malaysia that are practically Christians, but have "Islam" status in their citizenship cards because of discrimination to the ex-Muslim converts in the country. The same thing may apply to some Catholics.
 +
 +
However, folks, this kind of case whereby a "Catholic" is a Christian is very unlikely to happen. A person, if saved and a Christian, knows the truth of salvation (except if he is an infant). For practising Catholics, do you really think they are Christians if everytime they think they are born again, it is because they are baptized (sprinkled)? Or, do you think they are Christians if everytime they think they received Jesus as Lord and Savior, it is because they eat the wafer god?
 +
 +
Second: I agree that the Catholics are no different with the liberal "Protestants". There is such a thing as true converts and false converts. (See Ray Comfort video for that one)
 +
 +
Third: If we have to classify Roman Catholicism as a Christian church, I think we have to define what Christianity means. My belief of Christianity is the biblical teaching of Jesus and the Bible. The "Christianity" mentioned everywhere else and the more common one is a collection of my biblical Christianity and the so-called pseudo-Christianity. Even if we have to choose the more common "Christianity" as the definition, I hope the term is defined first. Otherwise, some people including me will be upset with the statement like "Christianity comprises you-know-what".
12

edits

Navigation menu