1,513
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 89:
Line 89: + + + +
Use of bizarre jargon
"Deliberate ignorance about phenomena that evolution cannot explain, such as remarkable migration and homing, or the existence of the whale"? '''What?''' I can provide perfectly good evolutionary explanations for all of these. Do you really want me to do so? Or should this line simply be deleted from the article? [[User:Humblpi|Humblpi]] 12:30, 29 April 2008 (EDT)
"Deliberate ignorance about phenomena that evolution cannot explain, such as remarkable migration and homing, or the existence of the whale"? '''What?''' I can provide perfectly good evolutionary explanations for all of these. Do you really want me to do so? Or should this line simply be deleted from the article? [[User:Humblpi|Humblpi]] 12:30, 29 April 2008 (EDT)
== Use of bizarre jargon ==
If the deployment of "jargon such as 'quote mining,' 'moving the goalposts' and 'fundies'" by "evolutionists" is "bizarre", how should one characterize the use of jargon such as "[[evolutionist style]]", "[[professor values]]" and "[[public school culture]]" at Conservapedia? [[User:Dadsnagem2|Dadsnagem2]] 13:26, 29 April 2008 (EDT)