Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 93:
Line 93: + +
→Use of bizarre jargon: let's debate this
If the deployment of "jargon such as 'quote mining,' 'moving the goalposts' and 'fundies'" by "evolutionists" is "bizarre", how should one characterize the use of jargon such as "[[evolutionist style]]", "[[professor values]]" and "[[public school culture]]" at Conservapedia? [[User:Dadsnagem2|Dadsnagem2]] 13:26, 29 April 2008 (EDT)
If the deployment of "jargon such as 'quote mining,' 'moving the goalposts' and 'fundies'" by "evolutionists" is "bizarre", how should one characterize the use of jargon such as "[[evolutionist style]]", "[[professor values]]" and "[[public school culture]]" at Conservapedia? [[User:Dadsnagem2|Dadsnagem2]] 13:26, 29 April 2008 (EDT)
:Good question. Please join me in debate at [[Conservapedia:What constitutes jargon?]] if you have time. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 10:52, 30 April 2008 (EDT)