Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1: −
In ''Alexander v. Sandoval'', 532 U.S. 275 (2000), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that private individuals may not sue to enforce disparate-impact regulations promulgated under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.  Specifically, a lawsuit could not be maintained under that law to force a state to provide a drivers' license test in a foreign language.
+
In '''''Alexander v. Sandoval''''', 532 U.S. 275 (2000), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that private individuals may not sue to enforce disparate-impact regulations promulgated under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.  Specifically, a lawsuit could not be maintained under that law to force a state to provide a drivers' license test in a foreign language.
    
Justice [[Antonin Scalia]] wrote the 5-4 decision for the sharply divided court.  The [[liberal]] Justices dissented.
 
Justice [[Antonin Scalia]] wrote the 5-4 decision for the sharply divided court.  The [[liberal]] Justices dissented.
 
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
 
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
1,645

edits

Navigation menu