Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  
In '''''Alexander v. Sandoval''''', 532 U.S. 275 (2000), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that private individuals may not sue to enforce disparate-impact regulations promulgated under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.  Specifically, a lawsuit could not be maintained under that law to force a state to provide a drivers' license test in a foreign language.
 
In '''''Alexander v. Sandoval''''', 532 U.S. 275 (2000), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that private individuals may not sue to enforce disparate-impact regulations promulgated under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.  Specifically, a lawsuit could not be maintained under that law to force a state to provide a drivers' license test in a foreign language.
   −
Justice [[Antonin Scalia]] wrote the 5-4 decision for the sharply divided court.  The [[liberal]] Justices dissented.
+
Justice [[Antonin Scalia]] wrote the 5-4 decision for the sharply divided court, while the [[liberal]] Justices dissented.
 
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
 
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
1,590

edits

Navigation menu