Changes

In ''Becker v. Kroll'',  2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 17230 (10th Cir. July 19, 2007), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the [[Tenth Circuit]] held that a physician had a valid claim against state officials for retaliation against her under the [[First Amendment]] in connection with an investigation.

In '''''Becker v. Kroll''''',  2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 17230 (10th Cir. July 19, 2007), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the [[Tenth Circuit]] held that a physician had a valid claim against state officials for retaliation against her under the [[First Amendment]] in connection with an investigation.

The Court also held that the physician could proceed directly to a jury trial on her claim that the State of [[Utah]] had defamed her in how it reported "Fraud Cases-Dismissals" on the state website.

The Court also held that the physician could proceed directly to a jury trial on her claim that the State of [[Utah]] had defamed her in how it reported "Fraud Cases-Dismissals" on the state website.