1,645
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 1:
Line 1: − +
no edit summary
In ''Gonzales v. Thomas'', 547 U.S. 183 (2006) ([[per curiam]]), the [[United States Supreme Court]] emphasized that if an agency action is found by a court to be arbitrary and capricious, then the proper course is to remand to the agency for clarification of its reasons.
In '''''Gonzales v. Thomas''''', 547 U.S. 183 (2006) ([[per curiam]]), the [[United States Supreme Court]] emphasized that if an agency action is found by a court to be arbitrary and capricious, then the proper course is to remand to the agency for clarification of its reasons.
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]