105
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 165:
Line 165: + +
→Another perspective from the apathetic-liberal
::: OK, I'm learning. A mild summer can signify ... global warming in the views of some. That's news to me. As to life in outer space, I agree it's absurd but many [[liberals]] have believed in it with religious fervor, and wasted billions on looking for it. That's gullibility. The moon landing was real and brought back rocks disproving another liberal theory: that the moon had come from the earth. It didn't, and [[atheists]] have no plausible explanation for the moon now. See [[Moon Origins]]. But don't expect [[public school]] students to learn the truth!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:40, 3 May 2008 (EDT)
::: OK, I'm learning. A mild summer can signify ... global warming in the views of some. That's news to me. As to life in outer space, I agree it's absurd but many [[liberals]] have believed in it with religious fervor, and wasted billions on looking for it. That's gullibility. The moon landing was real and brought back rocks disproving another liberal theory: that the moon had come from the earth. It didn't, and [[atheists]] have no plausible explanation for the moon now. See [[Moon Origins]]. But don't expect [[public school]] students to learn the truth!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:40, 3 May 2008 (EDT)
:::: So, what's your theory on it? A captured asteroid? That seems to be the most logical explanation, at this point. [[User:IndianaJ|IndianaJ]] 19:08, 3 May 2008 (EDT)
So are you saying Aschlafly if it is wrong that the moon came from earth it must have been god?
So are you saying Aschlafly if it is wrong that the moon came from earth it must have been god?