Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
→‎Comments on the above: quick correction
Line 198: Line 198:  
:Andy you have sucessfully railroaded this talk page away from the article. Your claim that Liberal's claim to see UFOs (different from the possible exsistence of ETLF) exclusivly/more often than conservative something you still have not addressed is the map showing the distribution of UFO sighting remain largly in Republican states and mostly in rural areas were Republican voting is higher.
 
:Andy you have sucessfully railroaded this talk page away from the article. Your claim that Liberal's claim to see UFOs (different from the possible exsistence of ETLF) exclusivly/more often than conservative something you still have not addressed is the map showing the distribution of UFO sighting remain largly in Republican states and mostly in rural areas were Republican voting is higher.
   −
:Also you tend to treat YEC as a default stance. You think that by shooting down alternative theories yours then becomes right. However the moon was created it was not placed there magically 6,000 years ago. It is older than that any decent amount of effort would find you that. For starters there are human cultres that go back further than that. [[User:DanielB|DanielB]] 21:56, 3 May 2008 (EDT)
+
:Also you tend to treat YEC as a default stance. You think that by shooting down alternative theories yours then becomes right. However the moon was created it was not placed there magically 6,000 years ago. It is older than that any decent amount of effort would find you that. For starters there are human culters that go back further than that. [[User:DanielB|DanielB]] 21:56, 3 May 2008 (EDT)
   −
:'''Comment''' Did you read all the [http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/origin98/pdf/program.pdf talk abstracts]? Most were supportive of the GIT and the first invited speakers intial statement was that it is well established the Earth is 6.57 billion years old but dating the moon is harder yada yada... You have been selective with your choice of references and again showning yourself wrong in your claim scientist are censoring opposing views in that the disenters were invited to the conference in order to present the papers you cite. [[User:DanielB|DanielB]] 22:17, 3 May 2008 (EDT)
+
:'''Comment''' Did you read all the [http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/origin98/pdf/program.pdf talk abstracts]? Most were supportive of the GIT and the first invited speakers on timing intial statement was that it is well established the Earth is 6.57 billion years old but dating the moon is harder yada yada... You have been selective with your choice of references and again showning yourself wrong in your claim scientist are censoring opposing views in that the disenters were invited to the conference in order to present the papers you cite. [[User:DanielB|DanielB]] 22:17, 3 May 2008 (EDT)
346

edits

Navigation menu