Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
also a reference request
Line 1: Line 1:  
{{RefAppeal}}
 
{{RefAppeal}}
'''Out of sight out of mind''' is a  fallacy of thought. It occurs when in the case that direct evidence is not always in sight, a person does not believe that a certain action is happening. For example, many [[liberal]]s tout [[solar energy]] as extremely [[clean]], but do not realize that the manufacture of the panels creates many [[toxic chemical]]s that are placed in the [[environment]]. Since they do not see this, they assume that solar panels are perfect.
+
'''Out of sight out of mind''' is a  fallacy of thought. It occurs when in the case that direct evidence is not always in sight, a person does not believe that a certain action is happening. For example, many [[liberal]]s tout [[solar energy]] as extremely [[clean]], but do not realize that the manufacture of the panels creates many [[toxic chemical]]s that are placed in the [[environment]]{{fact}}. Since they do not see this, they assume that solar panels are perfect.
    
Another [[liberal]] example is [[terrorism]]: during 9/11, many liberals supported [[George W. Bush]] because terrorists had recently attacked. However, as the terrorist attacks on [[America]] stopped, they began to resent Bush and his actions to defend their safety and freedom.
 
Another [[liberal]] example is [[terrorism]]: during 9/11, many liberals supported [[George W. Bush]] because terrorists had recently attacked. However, as the terrorist attacks on [[America]] stopped, they began to resent Bush and his actions to defend their safety and freedom.
    
[[category:Logic]]
 
[[category:Logic]]
296

edits

Navigation menu