166
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6:
Line 6: + + +
no edit summary
I may be mistaken in this - but in conflicts like this the matter should be for a sysop to decide. And, by reverting Ed Poor's edit, it seemed that you were denying this established means of settling conflict here. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 17:05, 23 May 2008 (EDT)
I may be mistaken in this - but in conflicts like this the matter should be for a sysop to decide. And, by reverting Ed Poor's edit, it seemed that you were denying this established means of settling conflict here. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 17:05, 23 May 2008 (EDT)
::Bugler, this hardly qualifies as 'sex education'. There is no discussion of ANY of the processes, and it simply, correctly and blandly defines the term. Even the most basic dictionary would define it this way. Finally, your opinion that human biology is "disgusting" is very revealing. God's work is not to be derided, but respected, and it is a very bad idea to give out the impression that our bodies are "gross" or "disgusting" as you have suggested. How do you think young women reading this debate would feel about pregnancy if their first impression of it was that it was somehow "disgusting"? [[User:EngelUmpocker|EngelUmpocker]] 17:10, 23 May 2008 (EDT)