Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
169 bytes added ,  21:11, May 23, 2008
no edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:     
::Bugler, this hardly qualifies as 'sex education'.  There is no discussion of ANY of the processes, and it simply, correctly and blandly defines the term.  Even the most basic dictionary would define it this way.    Finally, your opinion that human biology is "disgusting" is very revealing.  God's work is not to be derided, but respected, and it is a very bad idea to give out the impression that our bodies are "gross" or "disgusting" as you have suggested.  How do you think young women reading this debate would feel about pregnancy if their first impression of it was that it was somehow "disgusting"?  [[User:EngelUmpocker|EngelUmpocker]] 17:10, 23 May 2008 (EDT)
 
::Bugler, this hardly qualifies as 'sex education'.  There is no discussion of ANY of the processes, and it simply, correctly and blandly defines the term.  Even the most basic dictionary would define it this way.    Finally, your opinion that human biology is "disgusting" is very revealing.  God's work is not to be derided, but respected, and it is a very bad idea to give out the impression that our bodies are "gross" or "disgusting" as you have suggested.  How do you think young women reading this debate would feel about pregnancy if their first impression of it was that it was somehow "disgusting"?  [[User:EngelUmpocker|EngelUmpocker]] 17:10, 23 May 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::Conservapedia is not supposed to be a how-to guide for how to make your own children, if that's what we're getting at... [[User:DanH|DanH]] 17:11, 23 May 2008 (EDT)
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
6,781

edits

Navigation menu