nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 15:
Line 15: + + +
How about basing it on the previous version?
::::: In the rapid back-and-forth here, a comment of mine seems to have got lost between edits. You had asked "where did I say human biology is disgusting?" - you said so in [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Pregnancy&curid=66299&diff=459213&oldid=459208 this comment], and [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Pregnancy&curid=66299&diff=459205&oldid=459203 here] you referred to these God-given processes as "gross". [[User:EngelUmpocker|EngelUmpocker]] 17:24, 23 May 2008 (EDT)
::::: In the rapid back-and-forth here, a comment of mine seems to have got lost between edits. You had asked "where did I say human biology is disgusting?" - you said so in [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Pregnancy&curid=66299&diff=459213&oldid=459208 this comment], and [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Pregnancy&curid=66299&diff=459205&oldid=459203 here] you referred to these God-given processes as "gross". [[User:EngelUmpocker|EngelUmpocker]] 17:24, 23 May 2008 (EDT)
----
The last round of edits started with EngelUmpocker replacing the entire (two-paragraph) article with a new version. The [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Pregnancy&oldid=441520 previous version] referred to pregnancy in general, whereas his new version refers almost exclusively to pregnancy in humans. And therein likes part of the problem, and solution, I believe. If you revert to the original version, or at least the first paragraph of that (the second wasn't the best-written paragraph around), and go from there, you might find it a little bit easier to write without getting out of family-friendly mode. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 04:54, 24 May 2008 (EDT)