Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 18:
Line 18: + + + +
sysop ruling
----
----
The last round of edits started with EngelUmpocker replacing the entire (two-paragraph) article with a new version. The [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Pregnancy&oldid=441520 previous version] referred to pregnancy in general, whereas his new version refers almost exclusively to pregnancy in humans. And therein likes part of the problem, and solution, I believe. If you revert to the original version, or at least the first paragraph of that (the second wasn't the best-written paragraph around), and go from there, you might find it a little bit easier to write without getting out of family-friendly mode. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 04:54, 24 May 2008 (EDT)
The last round of edits started with EngelUmpocker replacing the entire (two-paragraph) article with a new version. The [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Pregnancy&oldid=441520 previous version] referred to pregnancy in general, whereas his new version refers almost exclusively to pregnancy in humans. And therein likes part of the problem, and solution, I believe. If you revert to the original version, or at least the first paragraph of that (the second wasn't the best-written paragraph around), and go from there, you might find it a little bit easier to write without getting out of family-friendly mode. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 04:54, 24 May 2008 (EDT)
:We need a ruling from the project director about how vividly (and often) this encyclopedia needs to describe sex. My current understanding of policy is that we downplay it as much as possible, because the media (and even school textbooks) are saturated with it.
:Editorially, I hope that we can describe everything in pregnancy from conception to birth. There's another article for [[conception]], and by the way preganancy does not begin with sexual intercourse despite what Engel said. Until he acknoledges this mistake, he is hereby banned from this article. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 07:25, 24 May 2008 (EDT)