Changes

2. to the linear but ''immanent'' principal of F. Hegel which sees that developing Idea within the matter of History itself, developing according to a thesis, producing its opposite, an antithesis, leading to, in the combination of both, a new reality, a synthesis. This, in turn, leads to the "idea of Progress" but non directed and unguided by any transcendent principle.   

2. to the linear but ''immanent'' principal of F. Hegel which sees that developing Idea within the matter of History itself, developing according to a thesis, producing its opposite, an antithesis, leading to, in the combination of both, a new reality, a synthesis. This, in turn, leads to the "idea of Progress" but non directed and unguided by any transcendent principle.   

3. to the denuded of all Idea and spirit but retaining the linear history as vestige, now Marxism's "mechanistic"  principal of Utopian Dialectical Materialism - thesis, antithesis, antithesis of Class struggle. This leads to the "idea of the Inevitable".

3. to the denuded of all Idea and spirit but retaining the linear history as vestige, now Marxism's "mechanistic"  principal of Utopian Dialectical Materialism - thesis, antithesis, synthesis of Class struggle. This leads to the "idea of the Inevitable".

"Revelation to"  man, such as is provided by the [[God]] declared in the Old and [[New Testament]]s, rather  than "manifestation within" man (and all else) is the natural complement for the quest that man sets before himself for the solutions, fulfillments, alleviations, etc, required by his very living, and to which Philosophy addresses itself.

"Revelation to"  man, such as is provided by the [[God]] declared in the Old and [[New Testament]]s, rather  than "manifestation within" man (and all else) is the natural complement for the quest that man sets before himself for the solutions, fulfillments, alleviations, etc, required by his very living, and to which Philosophy addresses itself.