Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 51:
Line 51: + + + +
Talk:Kitzmiller vs. Dover Area School District (view source)
Revision as of 02:52, May 27, 2008
, 02:52, May 27, 2008a strong warning to all concerned
:::::I'll keep the 'vicious' and 'viscerally' biased source from the Evolution News link because you seem to like it as it is the only reference in the original. Since my re-write was written up from scratch from the court ruling, do I have your 'approval'? --[[User:Jimmy|Jimmy]] 13:32, 26 May 2008 (EDT)
:::::I'll keep the 'vicious' and 'viscerally' biased source from the Evolution News link because you seem to like it as it is the only reference in the original. Since my re-write was written up from scratch from the court ruling, do I have your 'approval'? --[[User:Jimmy|Jimmy]] 13:32, 26 May 2008 (EDT)
I recently compared the NCSE point of view with that of Wikipedia on ID. Its virtually identical. Writers at Wikipedia assume that NCSE is '''correct''', instead of treating them as one party to a dispute.
If you want to describe liberal POV here, be sure to label it properly. Say, for example, that the NCSE supported X because of Y. Now '''that''' would be helpful! (But saying "X is true" and giving NCSE as a reference is not helpful; don't do it any more, or we'll have to drop you from the project. Not just you, Jimmy, but anyone who writes like that.) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 22:52, 26 May 2008 (EDT)