300
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 55:
Line 55: + +
Talk:Kitzmiller vs. Dover Area School District (view source)
Revision as of 05:33, May 27, 2008
, 05:33, May 27, 2008POV?
If you want to describe liberal POV here, be sure to label it properly. Say, for example, that the NCSE supported X because of Y. Now '''that''' would be helpful! (But saying "X is true" and giving NCSE as a reference is not helpful; don't do it any more, or we'll have to drop you from the project. Not just you, Jimmy, but anyone who writes like that.) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 22:52, 26 May 2008 (EDT)
If you want to describe liberal POV here, be sure to label it properly. Say, for example, that the NCSE supported X because of Y. Now '''that''' would be helpful! (But saying "X is true" and giving NCSE as a reference is not helpful; don't do it any more, or we'll have to drop you from the project. Not just you, Jimmy, but anyone who writes like that.) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 22:52, 26 May 2008 (EDT)
:Why all the concern about the NCSE? Their POV is only used at the end of my article to explain cdesign proponentsists. I didn't even write that little sentence but it is stuck there because my edit was reverted. All I did was provide the reference to the people that discovered the sloppy editing of the ID text book. The other NCSE references are for the PDF file of the court ruling. Is there any reason why this link[http://www.pamd.uscourts.gov/kitzmiller/kitzmiller_342.pdf] is more valid than this one [http://www2.ncseweb.org/kvd/all_legal/2005-12-20_Kitzmiller_decision.pdf]? Come on, they both use the exact same PDF file of the court ruling. --[[User:Jimmy|Jimmy]] 01:33, 27 May 2008 (EDT)