111
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 463:
Line 463: + +
→Neutrality
{{unsigned|BushUSA99}}
{{unsigned|BushUSA99}}
::i don't think it is a scam, they present both sides of a issue, while conservapedia basically has forced conservativeness for articles. and as for the "bias in wikipedia" thing, most of them are just mistakes or temporary issues of bias and although there are several dozen of them, there are hundreds of thousands of articles in wikipedia, and as the bias article doesn't stay up to date, even thousands of mistakes over a long time in a public encyclopedia isn't that much. and no george bush isn't doing the right thing in iraq, more people are dieing then would otherwise (if we didn't invade). and Karajou, a small edit war? that is hilarious, you claim that makes wikipedia biased, even though i haven't once seen a sysop apologizing or admitting that they are wrong.-[[User:Greenmeanie|Greenmeanie]] 00:36, 27 May 2008 (EDT)
== References ==
== References ==