nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 463:
Line 463: − − ::i don't think it is a scam, they present both sides of a issue, while conservapedia basically has forced conservativeness for articles. and as for the "bias in wikipedia" thing, most of them are just mistakes or temporary issues of bias and although there are several dozen of them, there are hundreds of thousands of articles in wikipedia, and as the bias article doesn't stay up to date, even thousands of mistakes over a long time in a public encyclopedia isn't that much. and no george bush isn't doing the right thing in iraq, more people are dieing then would otherwise (if we didn't invade). and Karajou, a small edit war? that is hilarious, you claim that makes wikipedia biased, even though i haven't once seen a sysop apologizing or admitting that they are wrong.-[[User:Greenmeanie|Greenmeanie]] 00:36, 27 May 2008 (EDT) Line 499:
Line 497: − − ::like creationism...-[[User:Greenmeanie|Greenmeanie]] 00:04, 27 May 2008 (EDT) Line 663:
Line 659: − :::::lol why was he blocked for that?-[[User:Greenmeanie|Greenmeanie]] 00:11, 27 May 2008 (EDT) Line 792:
Line 787: − − :i assume its because they are saying it in such a way as to be negative. like pretty much everything else in this article-[[User:Greenmeanie|Greenmeanie]] 00:19, 27 May 2008 (EDT)
Revert; mainly replies to very old posts and the one that wasn't was merely abuse.
{{unsigned|BushUSA99}}
{{unsigned|BushUSA99}}
== References ==
== References ==
: No, you have it backwards. A source is not needed to prove that something never existed. The burden is on the person who makes the claim that something happened to support it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:00, 12 September 2007 (EDT)
: No, you have it backwards. A source is not needed to prove that something never existed. The burden is on the person who makes the claim that something happened to support it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:00, 12 September 2007 (EDT)
==Arbitary blocking==
==Arbitary blocking==
::: And you too? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 04:07, 18 July 2007 (EDT)
::: And you too? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 04:07, 18 July 2007 (EDT)
::::The user BushUSA99 was blocked infinitely for the above posting, and I considered reverting it too but left it to show cause. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 11:45, 18 July 2007 (EDT)
::::The user BushUSA99 was blocked infinitely for the above posting, and I considered reverting it too but left it to show cause. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 11:45, 18 July 2007 (EDT)
== Did you know ... ==
== Did you know ... ==
What relevance does saying Wales is an atheist have? The website is not atheist and covers all ranges of topics, so I don't understand why this has any place in the first sentence of the article. [[User:Luano|Luano]] 19:19, 23 May 2008 (EDT)
What relevance does saying Wales is an atheist have? The website is not atheist and covers all ranges of topics, so I don't understand why this has any place in the first sentence of the article. [[User:Luano|Luano]] 19:19, 23 May 2008 (EDT)