Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
405 bytes added ,  13:35, May 31, 2008
→‎Justifying statement 3: superb point, Philip
Line 246: Line 246:  
[[User:AdenJ|AdenJ]] 00:11, 31 May 2008 (EDT)
 
[[User:AdenJ|AdenJ]] 00:11, 31 May 2008 (EDT)
 
: So the strength of their argument doesn't count, only your opinion that they have an agenda?  I don't know what makes you think that they have an agenda, but I reckon by the same logic that ''you'' have an agenda in asking, so should we dismiss your question just as readily?  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:06, 31 May 2008 (EDT)
 
: So the strength of their argument doesn't count, only your opinion that they have an agenda?  I don't know what makes you think that they have an agenda, but I reckon by the same logic that ''you'' have an agenda in asking, so should we dismiss your question just as readily?  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:06, 31 May 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
: Excellent point, Philip.  AdenJ, ''everyone'' has an "agenda" and it is absurd to pretend otherwise.  You're not fooling anyone, AdenJ, to the extent you may pretend not to have an agenda.  This site exists in part because we reject the falsehoods of other sites (such as Wikipedia) that pretend to be neutral when, of course, they really aren't.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 09:35, 31 May 2008 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,350

edits

Navigation menu