127
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 78:
Line 78: + + +
Debate: If not naturalism, how do we decide which supernatural explanation is correct? (view source)
Revision as of 22:52, May 31, 2008
, 22:52, May 31, 2008no edit summary
I'd imagine the vast majority of users of this site would disagree with you there. A follower of a religion believes what he does because he thinks it true. I assert that he does this based on false premises.
I'd imagine the vast majority of users of this site would disagree with you there. A follower of a religion believes what he does because he thinks it true. I assert that he does this based on false premises.
: [[User:Paddyduffy|Paddyduffy]]
: [[User:Paddyduffy|Paddyduffy]]
I understand that most of the people on this site would disagree with me, but I understand the difference between faith and empirical knowledge. Faith does not provide "truth" in the way that most of the users here would claim it does, but that does not render it invalid or wrong. --[[User:IlTrovatore|IlTrovatore]] 18:52, 31 May 2008 (EDT)